tamilnet.tv බ්ලොග් අඩවියේ beyondframe නම යොදා එහි url එකද යොදා ප‍්‍රතිචාරයක් පළ කර තිබිනි. ඊට beyondframe ගේ සම්බන්ධයක් නැත. මෙයින් පෙනී යන්නේ beyondframe අපහාසයට පත් කරන්නට දිගින් දිගටම උත්සහයක් පවතින බව ය.
අප ගැන දන්නා උදවිය මේවා විශ්වාස නොකරන බව අපට සහතික ය. අප වැනි බ්ලොග් අඩවියකට කෙළින් ප‍්‍රතිඋත්තර දීමට අමාරු මෙවැනි අය ගැන අපට ඇත්තේ අනුකම්පාවකි.
අප පෙනී සිටින්නේ අනාගතය වෙනුවෙනි. හෙට අනිද්දා මියයාමට අපේක්ෂිත යුද උන්මාදය වෙනුවෙන් නොවේ.
අපට එල්ටීටිය සමග පෑහීමක් නැත. අප එල්ටීටිය දකින්නේ දකුණේ මුග්ධ භාවයට ප‍්‍රතිචාරයක් ලෙස පැන නැගුනු උතුරේ මුග්ධ භාවය ලෙසිනි.
එල්ටීටිය ඒ නිසාම දකුණේ නිශ්පාදනයකි.
අප සියලූ ආකාරයේ ත‍්‍රස්තවාදයන්ට විරුද්ධය. අප වඩාත්ම විරුද්ධ ත‍්‍රස්ත වාදය ඇතිවීමට තෝතැන්නක් බිහිකරන්නන්ට ය.
Posted in: Uncategorized
Beyond Frame 
ම
January 28, 2009
කාගේ හරි කට වහන්න ලේසිම ක්‍රමය කොටි හිතවාදී කියලා ලේබල් එක ගහන එකනේ.
surannga
January 28, 2009
Appreciate your take on the terrorism and LTTE, it will take quite a long time for these fake patriots to realize the truth…
Liberal Lanka
January 28, 2009
So the south is the sole creator of LTTE? Doesn’t tamil racism has anything to do with it? Why do you see racism as something that could only reside in the majority?
beyondframe
January 28, 2009
Your question is valid and it allows me to explain my position further.
In fact there is a component that comes from the North itself. But the bulk comes from the South, because of the very reason that the South was in power, since independence (not the North).
They had the authority to resolve the issues which they did not use and they had the authority which they used to create further issues.
On both counts they are responsible, more than the North.
Sam
January 28, 2009
Liberal Lanka,
I know you didn’t ask me the question, but since it is a very interesting question, hope you don’t mind I’m putting my two cents in to this too.
I think (elite) Tamils are equality responsible in this. You always need two sides to play ball. It was the Sinhala Kalu-suddha’s like Angarika Darmapala and Tamils equivalent to him, start this racist game. Still to this day I find some elite Tamil people who think they title to some sort of special privileges. And they bring up such things like number of Signatures in “Kanda-Udarata” agreement been in Tamil and such.
I can’t totally take beyond frames argument, not because it is false, because it is missing something. South was in power. True. But even that, Tamils had relatively sufficient power inside that. Even today, there are large numbers of elite Tamils involve in administrative process. Now I use the world relative, because politics been a dirty game, only mobs have true power in SL politics.
I think there is another factor to it, that we ignore most of the time. That is the concept of “country”. It is new to us (to Sinhalese and Tamil both), just like it is new to most of the countries started after British colonization. All most all those countries had to go through a civil war, before they full understand who they are. Some Sinhalese and Tamils in Sri Lanka still do not understand what a country is or what Sri Lanka is. They still compare the concept of Country with the pre-colonization administrative units. Tamils tries to take it back to colonization period, and Sinhalese tries to take it before that. So I don’t think it is fair for us to point finger at Sinhalese or Tamils. Looking at all other countries, a war is an evil necessity for every country to understand who they are and emerge as a butterfly at the end. And I hope we do at the end.
Liberal Lanka
January 28, 2009
Sam
Makes sense, you normally do.
rahula
January 29, 2009
me lipivalata ngo eken kiyak lebenavada oitavada hodai g…. kevanam